Namibia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC

Namibia
630,732 current US$
in 2011
Sao Tome and Principe
738,031 current US$
in 2010
Namibia rank
23rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
22nd

Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC over time

  • Namibia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
01.0M2.0M3.0M200220062011

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 738,031 current US$ against 630,732 current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 107,299 current US$.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 23rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 22nd of 36 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 645,860 current US$ 368,545 current US$ 277,315 current US$ Namibia
2010s 492,733 current US$ 738,031 current US$ 245,298 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross oda aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, dac, Namibia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 738,031 current US$ against 630,732 current US$ in Namibia as of 2010.
What is the difference in gross oda aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, dac between Namibia and Sao Tome and Principe?
107,299 current US$, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sao Tome and Principe?
7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2010.
How do Namibia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for gross oda aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, dac?
Namibia ranks 23rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 22nd of 36 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC donors total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/gross-oda-aid-disbursement-for-mineral-resources-and-mining-dac-donors-total-current-us/namibia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/gross-oda-aid-disbursement-for-mineral-resources-and-mining-dac-donors-total-current-us/namibia/sao-tome-and-principe/">Namibia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross ODA aid disbursement for mineral resources and mining, DAC donors total (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
42 places, 359 data points, 2002–2011
Last refreshed

This is described as mineral/mining policy and administrative management; mineral prospection and exploration; coal; oil and gas; ferrous metals; non-ferrous metals; precious metals/materials; industrial minerals; fertilizer minerals and offshore minerals. Data are in current U.S. dollars.