Egypt vs Guinea-Bissau: Gross ODA aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive

Egypt
8.53 million current US$
in 2011
Guinea-Bissau
7.53 million current US$
in 2011
Egypt rank
40th
Guinea-Bissau rank
42nd

Gross ODA aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive over time

  • Egypt
  • Guinea-Bissau
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M200220062011

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 8.53 million current US$ against 7.53 million current US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 1.00 million current US$.

That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.

Egypt ranks 40th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 42nd of 53 countries.

Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
2000s 29.44 million current US$ 3.21 million current US$ 26.23 million current US$ Egypt
2010s 14.90 million current US$ 8.42 million current US$ 6.48 million current US$ Egypt

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross oda aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive, Egypt or Guinea-Bissau?
Egypt, at 8.53 million current US$ against 7.53 million current US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2011.
What is the difference in gross oda aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive between Egypt and Guinea-Bissau?
1.00 million current US$, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Guinea-Bissau?
10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Egypt and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for gross oda aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive?
Egypt ranks 40th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 42nd of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Gross ODA aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive health, DAC donors total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Guinea-Bissau: Gross ODA aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/gross-oda-aid-disbursement-for-population-programmes-and-reproductive-health-dac-donors/egypt-arab-rep/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/gross-oda-aid-disbursement-for-population-programmes-and-reproductive-health-dac-donors/egypt-arab-rep/guinea-bissau/">Egypt vs Guinea-Bissau: Gross ODA aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross ODA aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive health, DAC donors total (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 585 data points, 2002–2011
Last refreshed

This is described as population policy and administrative management; reproductive health care; family planning; STD control including HIV/AIDS and personnel development for population and reproductive health. Data are in current U.S. dollars.