Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritius: Gross ODA aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive

Equatorial Guinea
1.83 million current US$
in 2011
Mauritius
1.66 million current US$
in 2011
Equatorial Guinea rank
50th
Mauritius rank
51st

Gross ODA aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Mauritius
02.0M4.0M6.0M200220062011

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1.83 million current US$ against 1.66 million current US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 171,980 current US$.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Mauritius's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 50th and Mauritius ranks 51st of 53 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 2.36 million current US$ 421,983 current US$ 1.94 million current US$ Equatorial Guinea
2010s 2.22 million current US$ 1.93 million current US$ 293,785 current US$ Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross oda aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive, Equatorial Guinea or Mauritius?
Equatorial Guinea, at 1.83 million current US$ against 1.66 million current US$ in Mauritius as of 2011.
What is the difference in gross oda aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive between Equatorial Guinea and Mauritius?
171,980 current US$, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mauritius?
10 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2011.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Mauritius rank globally for gross oda aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 50th and Mauritius ranks 51st of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a, published as Gross ODA aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive health, DAC donors total (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritius: Gross ODA aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive. Statizoid, drawing on Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/gross-oda-aid-disbursement-for-population-programmes-and-reproductive-health-dac-donors/equatorial-guinea/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/gross-oda-aid-disbursement-for-population-programmes-and-reproductive-health-dac-donors/equatorial-guinea/mauritius/">Equatorial Guinea vs Mauritius: Gross ODA aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross ODA aid disbursement for population programmes and reproductive health, DAC donors total (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
Development Assistance Committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Geographical Distribution of Financial Flows to Developing Countries, Development Co-operation Report, a
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
59 places, 585 data points, 2002–2011
Last refreshed

This is described as population policy and administrative management; reproductive health care; family planning; STD control including HIV/AIDS and personnel development for population and reproductive health. Data are in current U.S. dollars.