East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Georgia: IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per capita

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
33.3 DOD, current US$ per person
in 2024
Georgia
554.82 DOD, current US$ per person
in 2024
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
12th
Georgia rank
9th

IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Georgia
0200400600197019972024

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 554.82 DOD, current US$ per person against 33.3 DOD, current US$ per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 521.52 DOD, current US$ per person.

That makes Georgia's figure about 16.7 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 12th and Georgia ranks 9th of 12 groups.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 21.28 DOD, current US$ per person 41.61 DOD, current US$ per person 20.33 DOD, current US$ per person Georgia
2000s 22.15 DOD, current US$ per person 181.83 DOD, current US$ per person 159.68 DOD, current US$ per person Georgia
2010s 26.23 DOD, current US$ per person 470.59 DOD, current US$ per person 444.36 DOD, current US$ per person Georgia
2020s 32.37 DOD, current US$ per person 554.08 DOD, current US$ per person 521.71 DOD, current US$ per person Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ibrd loans and ida credits (dod, current us$), per capita, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Georgia?
Georgia, at 554.82 DOD, current US$ per person against 33.3 DOD, current US$ per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2024.
What is the difference in ibrd loans and ida credits (dod, current us$), per capita between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Georgia?
521.52 DOD, current US$ per person, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Georgia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Georgia rank globally for ibrd loans and ida credits (dod, current us$), per capita?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 12th and Georgia ranks 9th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Georgia: IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ibrd-loans-and-ida-credits-dod-current-us-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ibrd-loans-and-ida-credits-dod-current-us-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/georgia/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Georgia: IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per capita
Unit
DOD, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 6,298 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.