Argentina vs Zambia: IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre

Argentina
3,613 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
2,987 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
82nd
Zambia rank
85th

IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Zambia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197019962023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 3,613 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,987 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 626 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Argentina ranks 82nd and Zambia ranks 85th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 4 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 111.21 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 244.78 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 133.57 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 400.26 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 699.79 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 299.53 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 1,719 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,719 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 0.1979 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 2,588 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,989 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 599.45 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 2,225 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 975.18 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,250 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 3,228 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 2,334 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 893.41 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ibrd loans and ida credits (dod, current us$), per square kilometre, Argentina or Zambia?
Argentina, at 3,613 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 2,987 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in ibrd loans and ida credits (dod, current us$), per square kilometre between Argentina and Zambia?
626 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Zambia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Zambia rank globally for ibrd loans and ida credits (dod, current us$), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 82nd and Zambia ranks 85th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Zambia: IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ibrd-loans-and-ida-credits-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ibrd-loans-and-ida-credits-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/zambia/">Argentina vs Zambia: IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,056 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.