Guatemala vs Malawi: IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre

Guatemala
19,231 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
16,436 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
40th
Malawi rank
43rd

IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Malawi
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 19,231 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 16,436 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 2,795 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malawi ahead.

Guatemala ranks 40th and Malawi ranks 43rd of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Malawi Difference Ahead
1970s 386.3 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 670.49 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 284.19 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1980s 2,069 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 4,352 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 2,283 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
1990s 2,003 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 13,181 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 11,179 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2000s 5,327 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 12,421 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 7,094 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Malawi
2010s 14,523 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 6,085 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 8,438 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 17,783 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 13,656 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 4,127 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ibrd loans and ida credits (dod, current us$), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Malawi?
Guatemala, at 19,231 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 16,436 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in ibrd loans and ida credits (dod, current us$), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Malawi?
2,795 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Malawi?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Malawi rank globally for ibrd loans and ida credits (dod, current us$), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 40th and Malawi ranks 43rd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Malawi: IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ibrd-loans-and-ida-credits-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ibrd-loans-and-ida-credits-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/malawi/">Guatemala vs Malawi: IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,056 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.