Nepal vs Tunisia: IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre

Nepal
30,467 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
27,775 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal rank
26th
Tunisia rank
28th

IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Nepal
  • Tunisia
010.0k20.0k30.0k197019962023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 30,467 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 27,775 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 2,692 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tunisia ahead.

Nepal ranks 26th and Tunisia ranks 28th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 87.96 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,010 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 922.06 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 1,860 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 4,519 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 2,658 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 6,511 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 10,122 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 3,611 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 9,571 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 9,775 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 204.58 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 12,631 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 16,008 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 3,378 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 27,830 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 26,889 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 941.38 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ibrd loans and ida credits (dod, current us$), per square kilometre, Nepal or Tunisia?
Nepal, at 30,467 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 27,775 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in ibrd loans and ida credits (dod, current us$), per square kilometre between Nepal and Tunisia?
2,692 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Tunisia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Nepal and Tunisia rank globally for ibrd loans and ida credits (dod, current us$), per square kilometre?
Nepal ranks 26th and Tunisia ranks 28th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Tunisia: IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ibrd-loans-and-ida-credits-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nepal/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ibrd-loans-and-ida-credits-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/nepal/tunisia/">Nepal vs Tunisia: IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,056 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.