Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre

Rwanda
132,558 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
70,935 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
8th
Sri Lanka rank
11th

IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sri Lanka
050.0k100.0k150.0k197019962023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 132,558 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 70,935 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 61,623 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.9 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Rwanda ranks 8th and Sri Lanka ranks 11th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 659.07 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,045 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 385.6 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 6,434 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 7,014 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 579.94 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 20,244 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 22,118 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 1,874 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 24,353 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 33,052 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 8,698 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 36,403 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 46,728 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 10,325 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 111,194 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 62,470 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre 48,724 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ibrd loans and ida credits (dod, current us$), per square kilometre, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
Rwanda, at 132,558 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre against 70,935 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in ibrd loans and ida credits (dod, current us$), per square kilometre between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
61,623 DOD, current US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for ibrd loans and ida credits (dod, current us$), per square kilometre?
Rwanda ranks 8th and Sri Lanka ranks 11th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ibrd-loans-and-ida-credits-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ibrd-loans-and-ida-credits-dod-current-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sri-lanka/">Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
DOD, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 6,056 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IBRD loans and IDA credits (DOD, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.