Central Europe and the Baltics vs Zimbabwe: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), annual growth rate

Central Europe and the Baltics
38.48 % change on previous year
in 2023
Zimbabwe
100 % change on previous year
in 2014
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
18th
Zimbabwe rank
17th

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Zimbabwe
-2000200400600200220122023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 100 % change on previous year against 38.48 % change on previous year in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 61.52 % change on previous year.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.6 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 17th of 44 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 72.44 % change on previous year -13.84 % change on previous year 86.28 % change on previous year Central Europe and the Baltics
2010s -22.49 % change on previous year 56.67 % change on previous year 79.17 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), annual growth rate, Central Europe and the Baltics or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 100 % change on previous year against 38.48 % change on previous year in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2014.
What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), annual growth rate between Central Europe and the Baltics and Zimbabwe?
61.52 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Zimbabwe?
12 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2014.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Zimbabwe rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), annual growth rate?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 17th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Zimbabwe: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-annual-growth-rate/central-europe-and-the-baltics/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-annual-growth-rate/central-europe-and-the-baltics/zimbabwe/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Zimbabwe: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
144 places, 2,671 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.