Bangladesh vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time
- Bangladesh
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 327.29 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 67.42 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 259.87 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Bangladesh's figure about 4.9 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1972 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 11th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 8th of 121 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980s | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1990s | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2000s | -6.19 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 6.83 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 13.03 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
| 2010s | 438.53 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 13.99 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 424.54 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | -146.35 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 60.61 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 206.97 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Bangladesh, at 327.29 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 67.42 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- 259.87 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
- Bangladesh ranks 11th and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 8th of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.