Bangladesh vs South Africa: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
327.29 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
444.22 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
11th
South Africa rank
9th

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • South Africa
-1.0k-50005001.0k197219972023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 444.22 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 327.29 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 116.93 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.4 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was South Africa ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 11th and South Africa ranks 9th of 121 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
2000s -6.19 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 5.93 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 12.12 NFL, US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 438.53 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 73.27 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 365.26 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s -146.35 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 340.29 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 486.64 NFL, US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or South Africa?
South Africa, at 444.22 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 327.29 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and South Africa?
116.93 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and South Africa?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and South Africa rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 11th and South Africa ranks 9th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs South Africa: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/south-africa/">Bangladesh vs South Africa: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 8,147 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.