Brazil vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time
- Brazil
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 132.43 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 34.76 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 97.67 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Brazil's figure about 3.8 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ahead.
Brazil ranks 20th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 23rd of 121 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980s | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1990s | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2000s | 4.72 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 2.39 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 2.33 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Brazil |
| 2010s | 8.13 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 12.46 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 4.33 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) |
| 2020s | 85.33 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 27.32 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 58.02 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Brazil or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Brazil, at 132.43 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 34.76 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Brazil and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 97.67 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
- Brazil ranks 20th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 23rd of 121 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.