Burkina Faso vs Tanzania: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
41.9 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania
34.4 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
35th
Tanzania rank
36th

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Tanzania
-50050100197019962023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 41.9 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 34.4 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 7.5 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.2 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tanzania ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 35th and Tanzania ranks 36th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre —
1980s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre —
1990s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre —
2000s 2.74 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 2.5 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0.2425 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2010s -4.19 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 6.14 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 10.33 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Tanzania
2020s 16.72 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 60.95 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 44.23 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Tanzania?
Burkina Faso, at 41.9 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 34.4 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Tanzania?
7.5 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Tanzania?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Tanzania rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 35th and Tanzania ranks 36th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Tanzania: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/tanzania/">Burkina Faso vs Tanzania: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 8,147 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.