Central Europe and the Baltics vs Mexico: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
-7.91 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
12.2 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
44th
Mexico rank
43rd

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Mexico
-200-1000100197019962023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 12.2 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against -7.91 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 20.11 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.5 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Mexico ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 44th and Mexico ranks 43rd of 44 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Mexico Difference Ahead
1970s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
1980s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
1990s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
2000s 7.6 NFL, US$ per square kilometre -11.43 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 19.03 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Central Europe and the Baltics
2010s 3.37 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 55.17 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 51.8 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Mexico
2020s -20.79 NFL, US$ per square kilometre -17.52 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 3.27 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Mexico?
Mexico, at 12.2 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against -7.91 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Mexico?
20.11 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Mexico?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Mexico rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 44th and Mexico ranks 43rd of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Mexico: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/mexico/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Mexico: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 8,147 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.