Central Europe and the Baltics vs Tunisia: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
-7.91 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
2.76 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
44th
Tunisia rank
45th

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Tunisia
0200400197019962023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 2.76 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against -7.91 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 10.67 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tunisia ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 45th of 44 groups.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
1980s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
1990s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
2000s 7.6 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 67.69 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 60.1 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 3.37 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 11.35 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 7.98 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s -20.79 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 19.21 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 40 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 2.76 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against -7.91 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Tunisia?
10.67 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Tunisia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Tunisia rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 44th and Tunisia ranks 45th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Tunisia: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/tunisia/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Tunisia: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 8,147 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.