China vs Zambia: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

China
0.6221 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
5.15 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
47th
Zambia rank
44th

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Zambia
-50050100197019962023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 5.15 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 0.6221 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 4.53 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 8.3 times China's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was Zambia ahead.

China ranks 47th and Zambia ranks 44th of 121 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Zambia Difference Ahead
1980s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
1990s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
2000s 6.77 NFL, US$ per square kilometre -1.56 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 8.32 NFL, US$ per square kilometre China
2010s 7.09 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 7.93 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0.8406 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 23.33 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 40.78 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 17.45 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, China or Zambia?
Zambia, at 5.15 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 0.6221 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between China and Zambia?
4.53 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Zambia?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do China and Zambia rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
China ranks 47th and Zambia ranks 44th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Zambia: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/china/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/china/zambia/">China vs Zambia: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 8,147 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.