Congo vs IDA only: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

Congo
28.85 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA only
1.88 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
40th
IDA only rank
39th

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • IDA only
-100102030197019962023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 28.85 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 1.88 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in IDA only, a difference of 26.97 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 15.3 times IDA only's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was IDA only ahead.

Congo ranks 40th and IDA only ranks 39th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and IDA only in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo IDA only Difference Ahead
1970s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
1980s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
1990s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
2000s -0.898 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 4.65 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 5.55 NFL, US$ per square kilometre IDA only
2010s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 9.72 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 9.72 NFL, US$ per square kilometre IDA only
2020s 7.21 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 3.94 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 3.27 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Congo or IDA only?
Congo, at 28.85 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 1.88 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in IDA only as of 2023.
What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Congo and IDA only?
26.97 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and IDA only?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Congo and IDA only rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 40th and IDA only ranks 39th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs IDA only: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/ida-only/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/ida-only/">Congo vs IDA only: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 8,147 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.