Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Guatemala: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- Guatemala
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 1,488 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 170.41 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 1,318 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Guatemala's figure about 8.7 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guatemala ahead.
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 1st and Guatemala ranks 2nd of 44 groups.
Across the 6 decades both report, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980s | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1990s | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2000s | 14.64 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 4.02 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 10.63 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) |
| 2010s | 29.44 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 92.24 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 62.8 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 73.49 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 584.65 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 511.16 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Guatemala?
- Guatemala, at 1,488 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 170.41 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Guatemala?
- 1,318 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Guatemala?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Guatemala rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 1st and Guatemala ranks 2nd of 44 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.