Guatemala vs Latin America & Caribbean: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

Guatemala
1,488 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Latin America & Caribbean
74.09 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
2nd
Latin America & Caribbean rank
5th

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Latin America & Caribbean
-50005001.0k1.5k197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 1,488 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 74.09 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean, a difference of 1,414 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 20.1 times Latin America & Caribbean's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Latin America & Caribbean ahead.

Guatemala ranks 2nd and Latin America & Caribbean ranks 5th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Latin America & Caribbean in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Latin America & Caribbean Difference Ahead
1970s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
1980s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
1990s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
2000s 4.02 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 5.9 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 1.88 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Latin America & Caribbean
2010s 92.24 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 13.73 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 78.51 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 584.65 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 48.08 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 536.57 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Latin America & Caribbean?
Guatemala, at 1,488 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 74.09 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Latin America & Caribbean as of 2023.
What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Latin America & Caribbean?
1,414 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Latin America & Caribbean?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Latin America & Caribbean rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 2nd and Latin America & Caribbean ranks 5th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Latin America & Caribbean: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/latin-america-and-caribbean/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/latin-america-and-caribbean/">Guatemala vs Latin America & Caribbean: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 8,147 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.