Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Tanzania: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 34.4 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 9.94 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 24.46 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 3.5 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tanzania ahead.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 36th and Tanzania ranks 36th of 44 groups.
Across the 6 decades both report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980s | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1990s | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2000s | 3.48 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 2.5 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0.9795 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) |
| 2010s | 5.6 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 6.14 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0.5426 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 6.49 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 60.95 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 54.46 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 34.4 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 9.94 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tanzania?
- 24.46 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tanzania?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tanzania rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 36th and Tanzania ranks 36th of 44 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.