Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Tanzania, United Republic of: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 34.4 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 9.94 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 24.46 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 3.5 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 36th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 36th of 44 groups.
Across the 6 decades both report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1980s | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1990s | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2000s | 3.48 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 2.5 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0.9795 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) |
| 2010s | 5.6 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 6.14 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 0.5426 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2020s | 6.49 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 60.95 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | 54.46 NFL, US$ per square kilometre | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 34.4 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 9.94 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 24.46 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
- How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 36th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 36th of 44 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.