How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Serbia?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

IBRD only vs Serbia: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

IBRD only

63.2 NFL, US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Serbia

742.11 NFL, US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

IBRD only rank

9th

Serbia rank

8th

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

IBRD only
Serbia

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 742.11 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 63.2 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 678.91 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Serbia's figure about 11.7 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

IBRD only ranks 9th and Serbia ranks 8th of 44 groups.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	IBRD only	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	10.3 NFL, US$ per square kilometre	198.87 NFL, US$ per square kilometre	188.57 NFL, US$ per square kilometre	Serbia
2010s	15.33 NFL, US$ per square kilometre	122.65 NFL, US$ per square kilometre	107.32 NFL, US$ per square kilometre	Serbia
2020s	41.66 NFL, US$ per square kilometre	191.77 NFL, US$ per square kilometre	150.11 NFL, US$ per square kilometre	Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, IBRD only or Serbia?: Serbia, at 742.11 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 63.2 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between IBRD only and Serbia?: 678.91 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Serbia?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do IBRD only and Serbia rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?: IBRD only ranks 9th and Serbia ranks 8th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Serbia: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/serbia/">IBRD only vs Serbia: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit: NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 166 places, 8,147 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.