IBRD only vs South Africa: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

IBRD only
63.2 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
444.22 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IBRD only rank
9th
South Africa rank
9th

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • IBRD only
  • South Africa
0200400600197019962023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 444.22 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 63.2 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only, a difference of 381.02 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 7.0 times IBRD only's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was South Africa ahead.

IBRD only ranks 9th and South Africa ranks 9th of 44 groups.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade IBRD only South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
2000s 5.26 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 5.93 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0.6691 NFL, US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 15.33 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 73.27 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 57.94 NFL, US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 41.66 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 340.29 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 298.63 NFL, US$ per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, IBRD only or South Africa?
South Africa, at 444.22 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 63.2 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in IBRD only as of 2023.
What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between IBRD only and South Africa?
381.02 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and South Africa?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do IBRD only and South Africa rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
IBRD only ranks 9th and South Africa ranks 9th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs South Africa: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/ibrd-only/south-africa/">IBRD only vs South Africa: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 8,147 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.