IDA only vs Tanzania, United Republic of: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

IDA only
1.88 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
34.4 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
IDA only rank
39th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
36th

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • IDA only
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
-50050100197019962023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 34.4 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 1.88 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in IDA only, a difference of 32.52 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 18.3 times IDA only's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

IDA only ranks 39th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 36th of 44 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, IDA only averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA only Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1970s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
1980s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
1990s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
2000s 4.65 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 2.5 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 2.15 NFL, US$ per square kilometre IDA only
2010s 9.72 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 6.14 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 3.58 NFL, US$ per square kilometre IDA only
2020s 3.94 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 60.95 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 57.01 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, IDA only or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 34.4 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 1.88 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in IDA only as of 2023.
What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between IDA only and Tanzania, United Republic of?
32.52 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Tanzania, United Republic of?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do IDA only and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
IDA only ranks 39th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 36th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA only vs Tanzania, United Republic of: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-only/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/ida-only/tanzania/">IDA only vs Tanzania, United Republic of: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 8,147 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.