Least developed countries vs Mozambique: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

Least developed countries
5.2 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
33.39 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
38th
Mozambique rank
38th

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Mozambique
-200204060197019962023

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 33.39 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 5.2 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 28.19 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mozambique's figure about 6.4 times Least developed countries's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1984 it was Mozambique ahead.

Least developed countries ranks 38th and Mozambique ranks 38th of 44 groups.

Across the 5 decades both report, Least developed countries averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Mozambique Difference Ahead
1980s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
1990s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
2000s 1.35 NFL, US$ per square kilometre -2.75 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 4.09 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Least developed countries
2010s 8.34 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 10.46 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 2.12 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Mozambique
2020s 5.17 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 4.63 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0.5351 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Least developed countries

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Least developed countries or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 33.39 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 5.2 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Least developed countries and Mozambique?
28.19 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Mozambique?
40 years are reported by both, from 1984 to 2023.
How do Least developed countries and Mozambique rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
Least developed countries ranks 38th and Mozambique ranks 38th of 44 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Mozambique: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/mozambique/">Least developed countries vs Mozambique: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 8,147 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.