Russian Federation vs Zimbabwe: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

Russian Federation
0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Russian Federation rank
48th
Zimbabwe rank
48th

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Zimbabwe
-20-1001020197019962023

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 121 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
2000s 5.82 NFL, US$ per square kilometre -9.54 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 15.36 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Russian Federation
2010s -6.26 NFL, US$ per square kilometre -0.3348 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 5.93 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s -0.6325 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0.6325 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, Russian Federation or Zimbabwe?
Russian Federation, at 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between Russian Federation and Zimbabwe?
0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Russian Federation and Zimbabwe rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
Russian Federation ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 48th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Zimbabwe: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/russian-federation/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/russian-federation/zimbabwe/">Russian Federation vs Zimbabwe: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 8,147 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.