South Africa vs Thailand: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre

South Africa
444.22 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand
871.58 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
9th
Thailand rank
7th

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre over time

  • South Africa
  • Thailand
-50005001.0k197019962023

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 871.58 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 444.22 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 427.36 NFL, US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Thailand's figure about 2.0 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Thailand ahead.

South Africa ranks 9th and Thailand ranks 7th of 121 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 2 and Thailand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Thailand Difference Ahead
1990s 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 0 NFL, US$ per square kilometre
2000s 5.93 NFL, US$ per square kilometre -41.97 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 47.9 NFL, US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 73.27 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 51.85 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 21.42 NFL, US$ per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 340.29 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 488.67 NFL, US$ per square kilometre 148.38 NFL, US$ per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre, South Africa or Thailand?
Thailand, at 871.58 NFL, US$ per square kilometre against 444.22 NFL, US$ per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre between South Africa and Thailand?
427.36 NFL, US$ per square kilometre, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Thailand?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Thailand rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed (nfl, us$), per square kilometre?
South Africa ranks 9th and Thailand ranks 7th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Thailand: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/ifc-private-nonguaranteed-nfl-us-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/thailand/">South Africa vs Thailand: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$), per square kilometre
Unit
NFL, US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
166 places, 8,147 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.