Belarus vs Malaysia: IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$)
Belarus
0 NFL, US$
in 2024
Malaysia
0 NFL, US$
in 2016
Belarus rank
50th
Malaysia rank
50th
IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$) over time
- Belarus
- Malaysia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 0 NFL, US$ against 0 NFL, US$ in Malaysia, a difference of 0 NFL, US$.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Malaysia ahead.
Belarus ranks 50th and Malaysia ranks 50th of 123 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 NFL, US$ | 0 NFL, US$ | 0 NFL, US$ | — |
| 2000s | 2.28 million NFL, US$ | -8,610 NFL, US$ | 2.29 million NFL, US$ | Belarus |
| 2010s | 8.51 million NFL, US$ | 0 NFL, US$ | 8.51 million NFL, US$ | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ifc, private nonguaranteed, Belarus or Malaysia?
- Belarus, at 0 NFL, US$ against 0 NFL, US$ in Malaysia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ifc, private nonguaranteed between Belarus and Malaysia?
- 0 NFL, US$, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Malaysia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2016.
- How do Belarus and Malaysia rank globally for ifc, private nonguaranteed?
- Belarus ranks 50th and Malaysia ranks 50th of 123 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Debt Statistics, World Bank (WB), published as IFC, private nonguaranteed (NFL, US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Nonguaranteed long-term debt privately placed from the International Finance Corporation (IFC). Net flows (or net lending or net disbursements) received by the borrower during the year are disbursements minus principal repayments. Data are in current U.S. dollars.