Bangladesh vs Dominican Republic: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled

Bangladesh
441.66 million TDS, current US$
in 2024
Dominican Republic
368.88 million TDS, current US$
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
17th
Dominican Republic rank
20th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Dominican Republic
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M197019972024

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 441.66 million TDS, current US$ against 368.88 million TDS, current US$ in Dominican Republic, a difference of 72.79 million TDS, current US$.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.2 times Dominican Republic's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1972 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 17th and Dominican Republic ranks 20th of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 4 and Dominican Republic in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
1970s 37.78 million TDS, current US$ 7.34 million TDS, current US$ 30.44 million TDS, current US$ Bangladesh
1980s 126.69 million TDS, current US$ 53.14 million TDS, current US$ 73.55 million TDS, current US$ Bangladesh
1990s 113.02 million TDS, current US$ 38.37 million TDS, current US$ 74.66 million TDS, current US$ Bangladesh
2000s 39.13 million TDS, current US$ 59.55 million TDS, current US$ 20.43 million TDS, current US$ Dominican Republic
2010s 85.36 million TDS, current US$ 165.09 million TDS, current US$ 79.73 million TDS, current US$ Dominican Republic
2020s 261.61 million TDS, current US$ 125.10 million TDS, current US$ 136.51 million TDS, current US$ Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), gaps filled, Bangladesh or Dominican Republic?
Bangladesh, at 441.66 million TDS, current US$ against 368.88 million TDS, current US$ in Dominican Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), gaps filled between Bangladesh and Dominican Republic?
72.79 million TDS, current US$, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Dominican Republic?
53 years are reported by both, from 1972 to 2024.
How do Bangladesh and Dominican Republic rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), gaps filled?
Bangladesh ranks 17th and Dominican Republic ranks 20th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Dominican Republic: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-gaps-filled/bangladesh/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-gaps-filled/bangladesh/dominican-republic/">Bangladesh vs Dominican Republic: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
TDS, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 5,836 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.