Belarus vs Zimbabwe: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled

Belarus
52.21 million TDS, current US$
in 2024
Zimbabwe
51.91 million TDS, current US$
in 2024
Belarus rank
61st
Zimbabwe rank
62nd

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Belarus
  • Zimbabwe
0500.0M1.0B1.5B198120022024

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 52.21 million TDS, current US$ against 51.91 million TDS, current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 297,400 TDS, current US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Belarus ranks 61st and Zimbabwe ranks 62nd of 122 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 23.33 million TDS, current US$ 31.18 million TDS, current US$ 7.86 million TDS, current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 32.70 million TDS, current US$ 31.85 million TDS, current US$ 843,753 TDS, current US$ Belarus
2010s 373.86 million TDS, current US$ 11.25 million TDS, current US$ 362.61 million TDS, current US$ Belarus
2020s 24.94 million TDS, current US$ 24.78 million TDS, current US$ 166,645 TDS, current US$ Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), gaps filled, Belarus or Zimbabwe?
Belarus, at 52.21 million TDS, current US$ against 51.91 million TDS, current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), gaps filled between Belarus and Zimbabwe?
297,400 TDS, current US$, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Zimbabwe rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), gaps filled?
Belarus ranks 61st and Zimbabwe ranks 62nd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Zimbabwe: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-gaps-filled/belarus/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-gaps-filled/belarus/zimbabwe/">Belarus vs Zimbabwe: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
TDS, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 5,836 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.