Central African Republic vs Rwanda: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled

Central African Republic
42.42 million TDS, current US$
in 2024
Rwanda
47.60 million TDS, current US$
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
68th
Rwanda rank
65th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Rwanda
020.0M40.0M60.0M197019972024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 47.60 million TDS, current US$ against 42.42 million TDS, current US$ in Central African Republic, a difference of 5.18 million TDS, current US$.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Rwanda ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 68th and Rwanda ranks 65th of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Rwanda Difference Ahead
1970s 677,082 TDS, current US$ 2.47 million TDS, current US$ 1.80 million TDS, current US$ Rwanda
1980s 8.66 million TDS, current US$ 1.29 million TDS, current US$ 7.37 million TDS, current US$ Central African Republic
1990s 6.68 million TDS, current US$ 2.09 million TDS, current US$ 4.59 million TDS, current US$ Central African Republic
2000s 7.45 million TDS, current US$ 3.08 million TDS, current US$ 4.37 million TDS, current US$ Central African Republic
2010s 8.66 million TDS, current US$ 1.62 million TDS, current US$ 7.03 million TDS, current US$ Central African Republic
2020s 21.53 million TDS, current US$ 42.09 million TDS, current US$ 20.57 million TDS, current US$ Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), gaps filled, Central African Republic or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 47.60 million TDS, current US$ against 42.42 million TDS, current US$ in Central African Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), gaps filled between Central African Republic and Rwanda?
5.18 million TDS, current US$, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Rwanda?
55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Rwanda rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), gaps filled?
Central African Republic ranks 68th and Rwanda ranks 65th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Rwanda: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-gaps-filled/central-african-republic/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-gaps-filled/central-african-republic/rwanda/">Central African Republic vs Rwanda: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
TDS, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 5,836 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.