China vs South Africa: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled

China
1.85 billion TDS, current US$
in 2024
South Africa
2.41 billion TDS, current US$
in 2024
China rank
8th
South Africa rank
5th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled over time

  • China
  • South Africa
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B197019972024

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 2.41 billion TDS, current US$ against 1.85 billion TDS, current US$ in China, a difference of 555.20 million TDS, current US$.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.3 times China's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1999 it was China ahead.

China ranks 8th and South Africa ranks 5th of 122 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 12.55 million TDS, current US$ 12.26 million TDS, current US$ 282,800 TDS, current US$ China
2000s 10.52 million TDS, current US$ 8.08 million TDS, current US$ 2.43 million TDS, current US$ China
2010s 19.22 million TDS, current US$ 4.91 million TDS, current US$ 14.31 million TDS, current US$ China
2020s 878.52 million TDS, current US$ 712.96 million TDS, current US$ 165.57 million TDS, current US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), gaps filled, China or South Africa?
South Africa, at 2.41 billion TDS, current US$ against 1.85 billion TDS, current US$ in China as of 2024.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), gaps filled between China and South Africa?
555.20 million TDS, current US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2024.
How do China and South Africa rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), gaps filled?
China ranks 8th and South Africa ranks 5th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs South Africa: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-gaps-filled/china/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-gaps-filled/china/south-africa/">China vs South Africa: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
TDS, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 5,836 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) with 75 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.