Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Sudan: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per capita

Lao People's Democratic Republic
1 TDS, current US$ per person
in 2024
Sudan
0.8084 TDS, current US$ per person
in 2024
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
108th
Sudan rank
111th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per capita over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Sudan
0102030197019972024

How they compare

Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 1 TDS, current US$ per person against 0.8084 TDS, current US$ per person in Sudan, a difference of 0.1916 TDS, current US$ per person.

That makes Lao People's Democratic Republic's figure about 1.2 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Sudan ahead.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 108th and Sudan ranks 111th of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Lao People's Democratic Republic averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Sudan Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0112 TDS, current US$ per person 2.68 TDS, current US$ per person 2.67 TDS, current US$ per person Sudan
1980s 0.3929 TDS, current US$ per person 2.45 TDS, current US$ per person 2.06 TDS, current US$ per person Sudan
1990s 0.5781 TDS, current US$ per person 1.16 TDS, current US$ per person 0.582 TDS, current US$ per person Sudan
2000s 1.22 TDS, current US$ per person 1.29 TDS, current US$ per person 0.0731 TDS, current US$ per person Sudan
2010s 0.2594 TDS, current US$ per person 0.2081 TDS, current US$ per person 0.0513 TDS, current US$ per person Lao People's Democratic Republic
2020s 0.4824 TDS, current US$ per person 6.12 TDS, current US$ per person 5.64 TDS, current US$ per person Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per capita, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Sudan?
Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 1 TDS, current US$ per person against 0.8084 TDS, current US$ per person in Sudan as of 2024.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per capita between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Sudan?
0.1916 TDS, current US$ per person, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Sudan?
45 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2024.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Sudan rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per capita?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 108th and Sudan ranks 111th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Sudan: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-capita/lao-pdr/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-capita/lao-pdr/sudan/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Sudan: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per capita
Unit
TDS, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 5,761 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.