Montenegro vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per capita

Montenegro
75.4 TDS, current US$ per person
in 2024
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
6.24 TDS, current US$ per person
in 2024
Montenegro rank
6th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
8th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per capita over time

  • Montenegro
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
020406080197019972024

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 75.4 TDS, current US$ per person against 6.24 TDS, current US$ per person in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 69.16 TDS, current US$ per person.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 12.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Montenegro ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 8th of 122 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 2 and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2000s 1.35 TDS, current US$ per person 0.8335 TDS, current US$ per person 0.5172 TDS, current US$ per person Montenegro
2010s 0.1138 TDS, current US$ per person 0.6891 TDS, current US$ per person 0.5753 TDS, current US$ per person Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2020s 25.48 TDS, current US$ per person 3 TDS, current US$ per person 22.48 TDS, current US$ per person Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per capita, Montenegro or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Montenegro, at 75.4 TDS, current US$ per person against 6.24 TDS, current US$ per person in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2024.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per capita between Montenegro and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
69.16 TDS, current US$ per person, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Montenegro and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per capita?
Montenegro ranks 6th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 8th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Montenegro vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-capita/montenegro/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-capita/montenegro/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Montenegro vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per capita
Unit
TDS, current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
134 places, 5,761 data points, 1970–2024
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.