Afghanistan vs Central African Republic: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Afghanistan
42.86 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic
50.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
103rd
Central African Republic rank
101st

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Central African Republic
0204060197019962023

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 50.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 42.86 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Afghanistan, a difference of 7.7 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.2 times Afghanistan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 103rd and Central African Republic ranks 101st of 121 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Central African Republic in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Central African Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 1.95 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 25.32 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 23.37 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 19.67 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 13.89 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 5.78 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Afghanistan
2020s 21.65 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 26.17 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 4.52 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Afghanistan or Central African Republic?
Central African Republic, at 50.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 42.86 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Afghanistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Afghanistan and Central African Republic?
7.7 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Central African Republic?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Central African Republic rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Afghanistan ranks 103rd and Central African Republic ranks 101st of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Central African Republic: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/central-african-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/afghanistan/central-african-republic/">Afghanistan vs Central African Republic: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.