Albania vs Dominican Republic: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Albania
5,054 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic
4,593 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Albania rank
7th
Dominican Republic rank
9th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Albania
  • Dominican Republic
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k197019962023

How they compare

Albania currently reports 5,054 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 4,593 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, a difference of 461 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Albania's figure about 1.1 times Dominican Republic's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Albania ranks 7th and Dominican Republic ranks 9th of 121 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Dominican Republic in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 141.04 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 686.36 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 545.32 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2000s 508.9 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,233 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 723.83 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2010s 453.32 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,417 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,964 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2020s 3,091 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,331 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,760 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Albania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Albania or Dominican Republic?
Albania, at 5,054 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 4,593 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Albania and Dominican Republic?
461 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Albania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Dominican Republic?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Albania and Dominican Republic rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Albania ranks 7th and Dominican Republic ranks 9th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs Dominican Republic: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/albania/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/albania/dominican-republic/">Albania vs Dominican Republic: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.