Argentina vs Grenada: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Argentina
7,679 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Grenada
15,051 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
3rd
Grenada rank
2nd

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Grenada
05.0k10.0k15.0k197219972023

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 15,051 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 7,679 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 7,372 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Grenada's figure about 2.0 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Grenada ahead.

Argentina ranks 3rd and Grenada ranks 2nd of 121 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Grenada Difference Ahead
1970s 65.36 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,120 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,055 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
1980s 190.7 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,455 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,264 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
1990s 394.67 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 543.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 148.86 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2000s 1,128 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,198 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,070 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2010s 52.63 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7,726 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7,674 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2020s 4,209 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 10,009 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 5,800 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Argentina or Grenada?
Grenada, at 15,051 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 7,679 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Argentina and Grenada?
7,372 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Grenada?
42 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Grenada rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 3rd and Grenada ranks 2nd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Grenada: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/grenada/">Argentina vs Grenada: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.