Argentina vs Jamaica: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Argentina
7,679 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
27,962 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
3rd
Jamaica rank
1st

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Jamaica
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197019962023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 27,962 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 7,679 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 20,283 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 3.6 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1973 it was Jamaica ahead.

Argentina ranks 3rd and Jamaica ranks 1st of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Jamaica in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Jamaica Difference Ahead
1970s 53.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,278 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,224 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 190.7 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 13,704 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 13,513 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 316.44 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7,895 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7,578 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 1,128 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 958.65 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 169.35 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 52.63 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 9,928 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 9,875 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 4,209 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 16,775 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 12,567 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Argentina or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 27,962 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 7,679 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Argentina and Jamaica?
20,283 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Jamaica?
51 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Jamaica rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 3rd and Jamaica ranks 1st of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Jamaica: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/argentina/jamaica/">Argentina vs Jamaica: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.