Bhutan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Bhutan
34.17 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
32.93 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
109th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
112th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bhutan
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0100200300400197319982023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 34.17 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 32.93 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 1.24 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Bhutan ranks 109th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 112th of 121 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 7.94 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 36.58 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 28.64 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 5.24 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 13.33 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 8.1 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 0.4339 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 44.7 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 44.27 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 11.79 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 128.62 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 116.82 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Bhutan or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Bhutan, at 34.17 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 32.93 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Bhutan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
1.24 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Tanzania, United Republic of?
25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Bhutan ranks 109th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 112th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/tanzania/">Bhutan vs Tanzania, United Republic of: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.