Bolivia vs Mauritania: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Bolivia
18.57 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
17.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia rank
117th
Mauritania rank
118th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bolivia
  • Mauritania
0100200300197119972023

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 18.57 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 17.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 1.04 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.1 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 117th and Mauritania ranks 118th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 5 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Mauritania Difference Ahead
1970s 3.84 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 0.5377 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3.3 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
1980s 26.09 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 13.13 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 12.96 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
1990s 33.04 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 9.84 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 23.2 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2000s 16.55 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7.14 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 9.41 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2010s 0.4166 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7.72 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7.3 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mauritania
2020s 86.11 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 15.71 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 70.4 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Bolivia or Mauritania?
Bolivia, at 18.57 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 17.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Bolivia and Mauritania?
1.04 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Mauritania?
52 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Mauritania rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Bolivia ranks 117th and Mauritania ranks 118th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Mauritania: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/mauritania/">Bolivia vs Mauritania: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.