Bolivia vs Somalia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Bolivia
18.57 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Somalia
16.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia rank
117th
Somalia rank
119th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bolivia
  • Somalia
0200400600197019962023

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 18.57 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 16.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Somalia, a difference of 1.72 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.1 times Somalia's.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Bolivia ahead.

Bolivia ranks 117th and Somalia ranks 119th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 5 and Somalia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Somalia Difference Ahead
1970s 4.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 0.4984 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 4.06 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
1980s 26.09 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 23.33 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2.76 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
1990s 31.23 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1.32 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 29.91 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2000s 16.55 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1.11 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 15.44 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2010s 0.4166 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 0.3141 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 0.1025 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2020s 86.11 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 141.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 55.74 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Somalia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Bolivia or Somalia?
Bolivia, at 18.57 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 16.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Somalia as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Bolivia and Somalia?
1.72 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Somalia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Somalia rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Bolivia ranks 117th and Somalia ranks 119th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Somalia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/somalia-fed-rep/">Bolivia vs Somalia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.