Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
3,103 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
3,117 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
19th
Ecuador rank
18th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Ecuador
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197019962023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 3,117 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,103 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 14 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Ecuador ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 19th and Ecuador ranks 18th of 121 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Ecuador in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 190.13 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 154.05 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 36.09 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 559.91 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 193.01 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 366.9 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 2,282 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 33.31 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,249 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 1,087 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,532 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 444.78 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 3,117 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,103 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
14 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 19th and Ecuador ranks 18th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/ecuador/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.