Botswana vs Sudan: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Botswana
22.18 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sudan
21.8 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
115th
Sudan rank
116th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Sudan
0200400600800199920112023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 22.18 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 21.8 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 0.38 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

Botswana ranks 115th and Sudan ranks 116th of 121 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 0.2649 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 4.33 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 4.06 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sudan
2020s 7.65 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 191.96 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 184.3 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Botswana or Sudan?
Botswana, at 22.18 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 21.8 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Botswana and Sudan?
0.38 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Sudan rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 115th and Sudan ranks 116th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Sudan: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/sudan/">Botswana vs Sudan: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.