Burkina Faso vs Zambia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Burkina Faso
101.61 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
96.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
88th
Zambia rank
91st

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Zambia
01.0k2.0k3.0k197019962023

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 101.61 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 96.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 5.08 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Zambia ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 88th and Zambia ranks 91st of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Zambia Difference Ahead
1970s 0.0236 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 34.4 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 34.38 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 5.14 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 124.86 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 119.73 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 5.32 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 363.12 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 357.8 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 14.39 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 75.1 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 60.71 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 59.8 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 51.77 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 8.03 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso
2020s 102.67 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 39.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 63.11 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Burkina Faso or Zambia?
Burkina Faso, at 101.61 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 96.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Burkina Faso and Zambia?
5.08 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Zambia rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Burkina Faso ranks 88th and Zambia ranks 91st of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Zambia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burkina-faso/zambia/">Burkina Faso vs Zambia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.