Burundi vs Senegal: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Burundi
673.67 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Senegal
696.76 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
44th
Senegal rank
43rd

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Burundi
  • Senegal
02505007501.0k1.2k197019962023

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 696.76 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 673.67 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 23.09 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 44th and Senegal ranks 43rd of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 4 and Senegal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Senegal Difference Ahead
1970s 127.05 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 18.84 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 108.21 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 136.97 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 265.03 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 128.06 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
1990s 225.78 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 256.87 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 31.09 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Senegal
2000s 212.43 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 94.63 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 117.8 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2010s 483.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 101.83 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 382.02 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Burundi
2020s 571.37 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 212.52 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 358.84 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Burundi or Senegal?
Senegal, at 696.76 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 673.67 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Burundi and Senegal?
23.09 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Senegal?
50 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Senegal rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Burundi ranks 44th and Senegal ranks 43rd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Senegal: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/senegal/">Burundi vs Senegal: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.