Cameroon vs Myanmar: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Cameroon
192.15 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar
178.04 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cameroon rank
75th
Myanmar rank
76th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Cameroon
  • Myanmar
0200400600197119972023

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 192.15 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 178.04 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Myanmar, a difference of 14.11 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Myanmar ahead.

Cameroon ranks 75th and Myanmar ranks 76th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 3 and Myanmar in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Myanmar Difference Ahead
1970s 21.81 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 40.94 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 19.13 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar
1980s 17.44 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 41.17 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 23.73 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar
1990s 36.19 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3.06 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 33.13 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2000s 83.22 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2.38 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 80.84 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2010s 34.14 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1.03 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 33.11 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Cameroon
2020s 54.68 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 55.33 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 0.6441 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Cameroon or Myanmar?
Cameroon, at 192.15 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 178.04 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Cameroon and Myanmar?
14.11 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Myanmar?
38 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2023.
How do Cameroon and Myanmar rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Cameroon ranks 75th and Myanmar ranks 76th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Myanmar: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/myanmar/">Cameroon vs Myanmar: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.