Central African Republic vs Mongolia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Central African Republic
50.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia
51.33 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
101st
Mongolia rank
100th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Mongolia
0204060197019962023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 51.33 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 50.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.77 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 101st and Mongolia ranks 100th of 121 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 3 and Mongolia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Mongolia Difference Ahead
1990s 9.96 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2.44 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7.52 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2000s 11.95 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 5.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 6.42 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 13.89 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 14 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 0.1057 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Mongolia
2020s 26.17 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 20.63 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 5.54 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 51.33 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 50.56 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Mongolia?
0.77 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Mongolia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Mongolia rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 101st and Mongolia ranks 100th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Mongolia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/mongolia/">Central African Republic vs Mongolia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.