China vs Indonesia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

China
196.73 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia
173.47 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
74th
Indonesia rank
77th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • China
  • Indonesia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197019962023

How they compare

China currently reports 196.73 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 173.47 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Indonesia, a difference of 23.26 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Indonesia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Indonesia ahead.

China ranks 74th and Indonesia ranks 77th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Indonesia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Indonesia Difference Ahead
1970s 0 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 25.62 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 25.62 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
1980s 14.54 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 49.1 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 34.57 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
1990s 37.03 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 173.4 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 136.37 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2000s 1.12 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 961.66 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 960.54 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2010s 2.05 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2.9 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 0.853 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 67.71 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 60.14 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7.57 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, China or Indonesia?
China, at 196.73 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 173.47 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Indonesia as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between China and Indonesia?
23.26 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Indonesia?
41 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do China and Indonesia rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
China ranks 74th and Indonesia ranks 77th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Indonesia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/indonesia/">China vs Indonesia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.