Ecuador vs Tunisia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Ecuador
3,117 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
3,657 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
18th
Tunisia rank
16th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Tunisia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k197019962023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 3,657 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,117 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 540 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Tunisia ahead.

Ecuador ranks 18th and Tunisia ranks 16th of 121 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 30.42 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 33.54 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3.12 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1980s 397.57 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 137.11 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 260.46 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 237.51 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 410.81 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 173.3 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 193.01 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 56.67 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 136.34 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 33.31 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 910.05 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 876.74 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 1,532 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,804 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 272.98 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 3,657 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,117 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Tunisia?
540 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tunisia?
45 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Tunisia rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 18th and Tunisia ranks 16th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Tunisia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/tunisia/">Ecuador vs Tunisia: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.