Egypt vs Sri Lanka: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

Egypt
3,935 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
4,492 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
14th
Sri Lanka rank
12th

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Egypt
  • Sri Lanka
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k197019962023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 4,492 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,935 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 557 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.

Across all 53 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.

Egypt ranks 14th and Sri Lanka ranks 12th of 121 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1970s 34.48 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 513.43 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 478.95 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 60.06 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,425 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,365 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 52.1 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 989.78 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 937.68 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 4.94 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,303 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 1,298 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 51.33 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 4,276 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 4,225 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 1,790 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,262 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 471.27 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, Egypt or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 4,492 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 3,935 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between Egypt and Sri Lanka?
557 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Sri Lanka?
53 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Sri Lanka rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
Egypt ranks 14th and Sri Lanka ranks 12th of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Sri Lanka: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/sri-lanka/">Egypt vs Sri Lanka: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.