El Salvador vs Grenada: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre

El Salvador
6,511 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Grenada
15,051 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
4th
Grenada rank
2nd

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Grenada
05.0k10.0k15.0k197019962023

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 15,051 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 6,511 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 8,540 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Grenada's figure about 2.3 times El Salvador's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Grenada ahead.

El Salvador ranks 4th and Grenada ranks 2nd of 121 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Grenada Difference Ahead
1970s 416.64 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 447.45 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 30.8 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
1980s 904.85 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,455 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 2,550 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
1990s 109.82 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 543.53 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 433.71 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2000s 43.57 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,198 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 3,155 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2010s 21.73 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7,726 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 7,705 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2020s 1,896 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 10,009 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre 8,113 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Grenada?
Grenada, at 15,051 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre against 6,511 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Grenada?
8,540 TDS, current US$ per square kilometre, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Grenada?
41 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Grenada rank globally for imf repurchases and charges (tds, current us$), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 4th and Grenada ranks 2nd of 121 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Grenada: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://debt.statizoid.com/compare/imf-repurchases-and-charges-tds-current-us-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/grenada/">El Salvador vs Grenada: IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
TDS, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
133 places, 5,507 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

IMF repurchases and charges (TDS, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.